• Commercial
  • Dubai Courts · Case No. 3940/2024
  • Represented the Plaintiff
  • Corporate & Business Law

Judicial dissolution secured for shareholder trapped in a deadlocked, loss-making company

Mr. R. Varma (our client, Plaintiff, 50% shareholder) vs. Novara Health Systems LLC and co-partner (Defendants)
Judgment issued 2024

Outcome

The Court ordered the judicial dissolution and liquidation of the company, appointed a court-listed liquidator, and set a 3-month liquidation timeline freeing our client from an indefinitely deadlocked, loss-making partnership.

Court's key findings

  • Company losses exceeded 75% of capital, meeting the statutory threshold for judicial dissolution
  • The company was verified as completely non-operational for an extended period
  • Judicial dissolution and liquidation ordered, with a court-listed liquidator appointed
  • Liquidation to be completed within 3 months

Rejected

  • Co-partner's refusal to voluntarily wind down the company overridden by the court once statutory grounds were proven
  • Co-partner's non-appearance did not block judgment case proceeded and was decided on the merits

Full legal breakdown

The specific UAE articles the court relied on, and how each one applied to this case.

Article 302 (Federal Decree-Law No. 32/2021 on Commercial Companies)

Enumerates exclusive legal grounds for dissolving a commercial company, including loss of assets preventing profitable investment and issuance of a judicial dissolution order.

Application:

Our client's evidence of severe capital depletion and total inactivity met this threshold directly.

Article 308 (Federal Decree-Law No. 32/2021)

Sets out dissolution rules specific to LLCs when losses reach half or three-quarters of capital.

Application:

Audited financials showing losses far exceeding this threshold supported the dissolution request.

Article 55 (Civil Procedures Law, Federal Decree-Law No. 42/2022)

Allows judgment to be rendered in the presence of the plaintiff despite a defendant's non-appearance at hearings.

Application:

Enabled the case to proceed to judgment despite the co-partner's non-participation.

This summary reflects the outcome of this specific matter based on its particular facts and evidence. It does not constitute legal advice and does not guarantee a similar outcome in any other case.

Related case studies

  • Real Estate

Property ownership restored to client after wrongful attachment and auction sale

Read the full case →
  • Real Estate

Landlord’s AED 945K rental claim dismissed, tenant awarded full deposit refund

Read the full case →
  • Commercial

Interior fit-out claim dismissed in full

Read the full case →

Facing a similar dispute?

Our team can assess your position and outline the strongest legal path forward.

Book a Consultation
klay legal light logo

Litigation Partner

shouqal-kathiri-law-logo-light
Facebook-square Linkedin Instagram

Contact Info

Our Services

 
Klay Legal © 2026 - All Rights Reserved.